You clearly can't differentiate between a person's policies and personal integrity. Such irrationality undermines the value of your comments.scooby wrote:Yes it might have been a despicable thing to say, but she was a despicable person, which is worse?
The banks weren't out of hand until one G. Brown changed all the supervisory framework, watering down the BoE's authority alongside an inept FSA. (Not that I think much of Mervyn King.)George wrote:she then went on to de regulate the banks ( look where that has got us) ............
Oh I can clearly differentiate, I meant both her policies and integrity thanks.filippos wrote:You clearly can't differentiate between a person's policies and personal integrity. Such irrationality undermines the value of your comments.scooby wrote:Yes it might have been a despicable thing to say, but she was a despicable person, which is worse?
As others have said, you may not have liked the policies (and there were a fair few I disliked), but people knew what they were and had a choice whether to vote for them or not. How many times was she returned? And she didn't lose at the polls.
I worked in one of the worst industries for restrictive practices - the print. I recall an occasion when a small group of us visited a national newspaper as part of a training course for a blockmaking company.fuzer wrote:....... the days when a factory worker could not tighten a screw - the electrician had to be called in - thus the machines were switched off.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests